Executive Summary

HMRC is governed by the Finance Act 2003 concerning Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT), which not only mandates the imposition of land tax on property transactions but also allows taxpayers to reclaim overpaid stamp duty if an error in assessment occurs.

Key Points

  1. Legislation and Guidance:
    • The Finance Act 2003 enables taxpayers to reclaim overpaid SDLT.
    • HMRC’s guidance, including SDLTM00385, is not legally binding, allowing HMRC to emphasize or downplay information to benefit tax revenue.
  2. Legal Framework:
    • Taxpayers retain the right to reclaim overpaid SDLT if justified by property conditions.
    • Reclaims are based on the actual legal framework, which recognises condition hazards as valid reasons for reassessment.
  3. Differences in SDLT Rates:
    • For property investors, residential properties attract higher SDLT rates compared to non-residential properties.
    • Accurate classification is important to avoid overpayment and ensure compliance.
  4. Impact on Other Classifications:
    • Local Authority Council Tax: Local authorities focus on the ongoing use and occupancy of the property, not its SDLT classification.
    • Mortgage Lenders: Lenders are concerned with the property’s condition, market value, and resale potential rather than its SDLT classification.
  5. Steps to Reclaim Overpaid Stamp Duty:
    • Ensure Qualification: Verify if the property meets criteria such as purchase date, location, and condition.
    • Assess Property Condition: Identify any health and safety hazards present at the time of purchase.
    • Gather Documentation: Collect thorough documentation including photographs, inspection reports, contractor invoices, and legal documents.
    • Submit Claim to HMRC: Provide a detailed explanation and well-organized evidence.
    • Follow Up: Maintain regular contact with HMRC to monitor the claim’s progress.

By following these steps and ensuring thorough documentation, taxpayers can reclaim overpaid stamp duty.


Understanding HMRC’s Stance on Stamp Duty Reclaims

When it comes to collecting taxes, HMRC is very clear and explicit. However, when it involves potential tax losses, their guidance becomes less straightforward. HMRC uses their guidance to ‘steer’ the public towards certain interpretations, emphasizing points that benefit tax revenue while downplaying those that might lead to tax refunds. This guidance is influential but not legally binding.

HMRC Guidance and Its Influence

HMRC’s guidance on stamp duty reclaims due to property condition shows their discomfort with the situation. While the law allows for such reclaims, which represent a tax loss for HMRC, their guidance can create fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD) among taxpayers.

Legal Framework and Taxpayer Rights

HMRC is bound by the Finance Act 2003, which governs Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT). This act allows HMRC to impose land tax on property transactions and gives taxpayers the right to reclaim overpaid stamp duty if there has been an error in its assessment.

Changes in Guidance

Previously, HMRC’s guidance SDLTM00385 stated:

Examples of when a property will be considered not suitable for use as a dwelling include:
· Where repair work cannot be undertaken safely because of high levels of asbestos that cannot be removed without deconstructing the property.
· Where there is high radioactive pollution present.
· Where there is a high probability of walls collapsing.
· Where there are hazards present that would cause a local authority to issue a prohibition notice restricting use of the premises.

This implied that properties with hazardous condition issues could be considered non-residential for stamp duty purposes. However, as of July 9, 2024, HMRC removed this guidance.

The Impact of Revised Guidance

Arguably, realising the tax loss implications of classifying properties as non-residential due to potential legal restrictions, HMRC changed its guidance. Since this guidance is not legally binding, HMRC can ‘steer the narrative’ to their advantage. However, taxpayers still have the right to reclaim overpaid stamp duty based on the property’s condition if justified by the law.

Justification for Reclaims

Despite HMRC’s changing guidelines, the law and case law support the right of any SDLT payer to reclaim overpaid stamp duty based on property condition. Many properties in need of renovation present hazards that justify such reclaims. Therefore, it is important for taxpayers to document and argue their case based on the actual legal framework rather than relying on HMRC’s shifting guidance.

Summary

While HMRC can change their guidance, they are still bound by legislation. Taxpayers have the right to reclaim overpaid stamp duty if the property’s condition at the time of purchase justifies it.

Differences in Rates for Residential and Non-Residential Properties

The rates of SDLT vary depending on whether the property is classified as residential or non-residential (commercial). Each type of property has its own set of rates and thresholds.

For residential properties, the SDLT rates are as follows:

  • 0% on the portion up to £250,000
  • 5% on the portion between £250,001 and £925,000
  • 10% on the portion between £925,001 and £1.5 million
  • 12% on the portion above £1.5 million

Additional surcharges apply for certain types of residential purchases. For example, an extra 3% is added for second homes and buy-to-let properties.

Non-residential properties, which include commercial properties and mixed-use buildings, follow a different rate structure:

  • 0% on the portion up to £150,000
  • 2% on the portion between £150,001 and £250,000
  • 5% on the portion above £250,000

These lower rates for non-residential properties can lead to significant savings, particularly for high-value transactions.

Calculation examples

  • Buy-to-Let Property for £150,000: Difference of £4,500
  • Buy-to-Let Property for £500,000: Difference  of £13,000
  • Owner-Occupier Property for £1,500,000: Difference of £26,750



Importance of Correct Classification

Correctly classifying a property as either residential or non-residential is important due to the substantial differences in SDLT rates.

For instance, a property incorrectly classified as residential when it should be non-residential could lead to the buyer paying a higher SDLT rate. On the other hand, if a residential property is mistakenly classified as non-residential, it could result in underpayment, leading to penalties and interest charges from HMRC.

Furthermore, properties with certain condition issues, such as those that are derelict or uninhabitable, or potentially legally restricted from use as a dwelling, may qualify for reclassification. This reclassification can potentially lower the SDLT liability if the property is assessed at the lower non-residential rates. Accurate classification is essential not only for compliance but also for ensuring that buyers do not face unnecessary tax burdens.

Use the stamp duty calculator to see how much you might reclaim.

Calculating a refund. Stamp Duty Land Tax Reclaim Calculator

Stamp Duty Land Tax Calculator

For calculating reclaims due to reclassification from residential stamp duty rates to non-residential rates, this applies to properties re-classified as mixed-use or non-residential due to uninhabitability.

'); printWindow.document.close(); printWindow.print(); }addEventListeners();

Misclassification of Properties 

Properties can often be misclassified as residential when, in fact, they should be assessed as non-residential for Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) purposes due to being uninhabitable. This misclassification can result in overpayment of SDLT, which the Finance Act 2003 allows taxpayers to reclaim if they can demonstrate the property’s true condition at the time of purchase.
Legal Key Principles Behind Reclassification
Uninhabitability can be defined based on two overarching legal principles:

  1. Inability to Reuse the Property
    • A property may be in such a severe state of dereliction that it cannot be repaired or restored to a habitable condition and must be demolished and rebuilt. Properties that are beyond repair should not be classified as residential for SDLT purposes.
  2. Legally Restricted from Use
    • Properties with significant condition hazards may be legally restricted from being used as a dwelling. If a property’s condition warrants a prohibition order due to safety and health risks, it should be classified as non-residential.

Legal Framework: Housing Health and Safety Rating System (HHSRS)
Condition hazards are defined under the Housing Health and Safety Rating System (HHSRS) legislation, which forms the basis of habitability standards. The Housing Act 2004, specifically Sections 20 and 21, grants local authorities the power to issue prohibition notices on properties to prevent their use due to various condition hazards.

Section 20 of the Housing Act 2004 states:

“If a local housing authority considers that a category 1 hazard exists on any residential premises, they must take the appropriate enforcement action in relation to the hazard.”

Section 21 of the Housing Act 2004 adds:

“A local housing authority may take enforcement action in relation to a category 2 hazard if they consider it appropriate.”

If a residential property could have had condition hazards that warranted a prohibition order, then the property could have been legally restricted from use at purchase and therefore should not have been assessed as residential for SDLT purposes.


Property Classification with Council Tax and Mortgage Lending

Changing the classification of a property for Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) purposes is a matter that exclusively concerns HMRC. It is important to understand that this classification does not influence the property’s classification for other purposes, such as local authority council tax or mortgage lending.

Local Authority Council Tax Classification

Local authorities are responsible for determining the council tax classification of a property. Their primary interest lies in the ongoing use and occupancy of the property, rather than its classification for stamp duty purposes. Here are some key points:

  1. Ongoing Use: Local authorities focus on whether the property is being used as a residence. This determines the council tax band and rate, which are based on the property’s use and characteristics rather than its status during a transaction.
  2. Occupancy Status: Council tax is typically concerned with whether the property is occupied or vacant. Changes in occupancy can affect council tax rates, such as discounts for empty homes or additional charges for second homes.
  3. Service Provision: Local authorities are more interested in the provision of services, such as waste collection and public amenities, which are tied to the residential use of the property.
  4. Regulatory Compliance: Local authorities also ensure that properties comply with housing regulations and standards, focusing on health and safety for current residents rather than the classification used during a sale.

Given these factors, local authorities do not consider HMRC’s classification for stamp duty when determining council tax obligations. Their assessment is based on practical and ongoing considerations related to the property’s use and condition.

Mortgage Lenders’ Considerations

Mortgage lenders have their own criteria for assessing properties, which revolve around the risk associated with lending and the potential for resale. HMRC’s classification for stamp duty purposes does not affect these considerations. Here’s why:

  1. Property Condition: Lenders are primarily concerned with the current condition of the property. They want to ensure that the property is habitable and in good repair to protect their investment. The property’s condition at the time of purchase, especially if it required significant renovation, is a critical factor.
  2. Market Value: Lenders assess the market value of the property to ensure that it provides sufficient collateral for the loan. This valuation is based on current market conditions and the property’s condition, not its stamp duty classification.
  3. Resale Potential: Mortgage lenders consider the ease with which the property can be resold in the event of foreclosure. They evaluate factors such as location, demand, and the overall marketability of the property.
  4. Legal and Compliance Issues: Lenders also look at any legal issues that might affect the property, including zoning laws, planning permissions, and regulatory compliance. These factors can influence the property’s value and marketability.
  5. Insurance and Safety: Mortgage lenders require that the property be insurable and safe for occupancy. They look for issues like structural integrity, safety hazards, and compliance with building codes.



The Legal Framework for Reclaiming Overpaid Stamp Duty

Finance Act 2003
The Finance Act 2003 is the cornerstone legislation governing Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) in the UK. It outlines the circumstances under which SDLT is charged, and importantly, it provides the legal basis for reclaiming overpaid tax. This legislation ensures that taxpayers are not unfairly burdened by misclassified property transactions.

Key Provisions: Paragraph 34, Schedule 10

  • Paragraph 34, Schedule 10 of the Finance Act 2003 specifically addresses the process and conditions under which a taxpayer can reclaim overpaid SDLT. It states:
    • (1) This paragraph applies where—
      • (a) A person has paid an amount by way of tax but believes that the tax was not due, or
      • (b) A person has been assessed as liable to pay an amount by way of tax, or there has been a determination to that effect, but the person believes that the tax is not due.
    • (2) The person may make a claim to the Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC) for repayment or discharge of the amount.
    • This provision ensures that taxpayers who have overpaid SDLT due to errors in classification or other reasons can seek a refund.

Eligibility Criteria
For a claim to be considered valid under the Finance Act 2003, certain eligibility criteria must be met:

  1. Property Purchase Date
  • The property must have been purchased within the last four years from the date of the claim. This is stipulated under Section 80 of the Finance Act 2003, which sets a four-year limit for making amendments to SDLT returns and reclaiming overpaid tax.
  1. Location of the Property
  • The property must be located in England or Northern Ireland. Properties located in Scotland and Wales are subject to different legislative frameworks for property taxes (Land and Buildings Transaction Tax in Scotland and Land Transaction Tax in Wales).



Legal Principles from Case Law

In property transactions, the classification of a property as residential or non-residential has significant implications for Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) rates. Two key principles are central to determining the appropriate classification: the property’s habitability and any legal restrictions on its use. These principles, established through various legal precedents, provide the foundation for reclassification and potential overpayment relief claims.

Principle of Habitability: “If Not Habitable, Not Residential”

The landmark case PN Bewley Ltd v HMRC (2019) is instrumental in shaping the principle that a property must be habitable to be considered residential for SDLT purposes. In this case, the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) ruled that a bungalow in a derelict and uninhabitable state was not subject to residential SDLT rates at the transaction’s effective date.
The Tribunal emphasised the importance of assessing the property’s condition at the effective date of the transaction. The Tribunal found that the bungalow was not suitable for habitation due to its dilapidated state, stating:

“Taking into account the state of the building as shown in the photographs… we have no hesitation in saying that in this case the bungalow was not suitable for use as a dwelling.”

This assessment was key in reclassifying the property as non-residential for stamp duty purposes. Similarly, properties that are in a non-habitable condition at the effective date of transaction should be considered non-residential.
The Tribunal also examined the projected future use of the property. Although the purchaser intended to demolish the existing structure and construct a new dwelling, the Tribunal noted that the key element was the property’s condition at the effective date of the transaction, regardless of future plans. The Tribunal stated:

“The test set out clearly in paragraph 18(1)(a) Schedule 4ZA is whether it was ‘suitable to be used as a dwelling at the time of purchase: it is not whether it was capable of becoming so used in the future.”

This underscores that intended future use does not retroactively alter the property’s habitability at the effective date of the transaction. The suitability test applies to the state of the building at the effective date of the transaction, emphasising that the classification of a property for stamp duty purposes must be based on its habitability at the time of purchase.

Principle of Legal Restrictions

Another key principle in determining the classification of a property for SDLT purposes is whether the property is legally restricted from use as a dwelling. According to the Finance Act 2003, a “dwelling” is defined as “a building or part of a building which is used or suitable for use as a single dwelling” (Finance Act 2003, Schedule 4, Paragraph 18). If a property is legally restricted from being used as a dwelling, it does not meet this definition and should therefore be assessed as non-residential for stamp duty purposes.

Relevant Cases Supporting Legal Restrictions Principle

Henderson Acquisitions Ltd [2023] UKFTT 739 (TC)
In Henderson Acquisitions Ltd, the Tribunal ruled that a property subject to legal restrictions preventing its use as a dwelling does not qualify as a dwelling for SDLT purposes. The Tribunal stated:

“Legal restrictions that prohibit the use of a property as a dwelling are decisive in determining its classification for SDLT purposes. A property that cannot legally be used as a dwelling does not qualify as a dwelling under the Finance Act 2003.”

Mudan [2023] UKFTT 317 (TC)
In Mudan, the Tribunal considered the impact of legal restrictions on a property’s use. It found that properties with legal prohibitions against residential use could not be classified as dwellings. The Tribunal noted:

“Where legal restrictions prevent the use of a property as a dwelling, such restrictions must be considered when determining the property’s classification for SDLT purposes.”

Fish Homes Ltd [2020] UKFTT 180 (TC)
In Fish Homes Ltd, the Tribunal emphasised that the classification of a property for SDLT purposes must be based on its legal status at the time of the transaction. The Tribunal stated:

“The suitability of the property for use as a dwelling must be assessed at the time of the transaction, including any legal restrictions in place.”

Given these precedents, a property that is legally restricted from being used as a dwelling due to condition hazards, and therefore likely would have warranted a prohibition order at the time of purchase, would not qualify as a dwelling under the Finance Act 2003.


Grounds for Reclaim

The most common grounds for reclaiming overpaid SDLT revolve around the misclassification of the property:

Residential vs. Non-Residential

A common issue leading to overpayment is the incorrect classification of a property as residential instead of non-residential. Residential properties typically attract higher SDLT rates compared to non-residential properties. Therefore, if a property initially classified as residential should have been classified as non-residential due to its condition or intended use, the taxpayer is entitled to reclaim the overpaid SDLT.

Mixed Use

A property can also be classified for stamp duty purposes as mixed-use if it includes both residential and non-residential elements. Mixed-use properties typically have components used for commercial purposes, such as storage, retail, or offices, along with residential elements. Stamp duty for mixed-use properties is assessed as non-residential. However, for the purposes of this article, we will not focus on mixed-use reclassification.

Reclassification: Inability to Reuse and Legal Restrictions

Inability to Reuse the Property
A property may be in such a severe state of dereliction that it cannot be repaired or restored to a habitable condition and must be demolished and rebuilt. Such properties should not be classified as residential for SDLT purposes. The principle here is that if a property cannot be reused in its current state, it should be assessed under the non-residential rates, which are typically lower than residential rates for property investors and owner occupiers purchasing over £1 million.

Examples of Inability to Reuse:

  • Severe Structural Damage: Properties with foundational issues, significant cracks in walls, or other structural problems that render them unsafe.
  • Total Dilapidation: Properties that have deteriorated to the point where they are no longer habitable, such as buildings with collapsed roofs, extensive water damage, or pervasive mould that cannot be remediated.

Legally Restricted from Use
As explained earlier, properties with significant condition hazards may be legally restricted from being used as dwellings. This can happen when local authorities issue prohibition orders under the Housing Act 2004 due to the presence of Category 1 or Category 2 hazards as defined by the Housing Health and Safety Rating System (HHSRS). If a property’s condition warrants such an order, it should be classified as non-residential for SDLT purposes.

Legal Framework: Housing Health and Safety Rating System (HHSRS) Condition hazards are defined under the HHSRS legislation, which forms the basis of habitability standards. The Housing Act 2004, specifically Sections 20 and 21, grants local authorities the power to issue prohibition notices on properties to prevent their use due to various condition hazards.

Section 20 of the Housing Act 2004 states:

“If a local housing authority considers that a category 1 hazard exists on any residential premises, they must take the appropriate enforcement action in relation to the hazard.”

Section 21 of the Housing Act 2004 adds:

“A local housing authority may take enforcement action in relation to a category 2 hazard if they consider it appropriate.”

If a residential property could have had condition hazards that warranted a prohibition order, then the property could have been legally restricted from use at purchase and therefore should not have been assessed as residential for SDLT purposes.

Common Condition Hazards in UK Properties
Properties with issues such as damp, mould, old wiring, gas problems, a damaged roof, or structural problems at the time of purchase might qualify for stamp duty reclaims based on their hazardous nature. The Housing Health and Safety Rating System (HHSRS) identifies health and safety hazards in residential properties, classified into two categories:

Category 1 Hazards: Serious risks to health or safety requiring immediate action, ordered by likelihood of occurrence in an un-renovated property:

  • Rising damp: Damp patches on lower walls caused by moisture rising from the ground.
  • Mould due to damp: Black mould growing on walls due to poor ventilation.
  • Dampness causing rot: Wooden structures rotting due to persistent damp.
  • Faulty electrical wiring: Exposed wires or old wiring prone to short-circuiting.
  • No functioning boiler: A broken boiler leaving the property without heating.
  • Excess cold (lack of heating): Inadequate insulation leading to cold indoor temperatures.
  • Lead in paint or pipes: Old lead-based paint flaking off walls.
  • Fire risk from faulty installations: Poorly installed electrical outlets or appliances.
  • Poor sanitation: Blocked or overflowing sewage systems.
  • Carbon monoxide: Faulty gas appliances emitting carbon monoxide.
  • Unserviced gas cookers: Gas cookers that haven’t been checked, posing a risk of leaks.
  • Falls associated with stairs: Steep, narrow stairs without handrails.
  • Unsafe stairs or steps: Broken or missing steps on a staircase.
  • Blocked or obstructed exits: Furniture blocking escape routes.
  • Broken or missing handrails: Staircases without secure handrails.
  • Unstable floors: Floorboards not fixed properly, causing instability.
  • Structural collapse: Significant cracks in walls indicating potential collapse.
  • Electrical hazards (e.g., exposed wiring): Live wires exposed in living areas.
  • Asbestos presence: Asbestos insulation in an older property.
  • Structural collapse of ceilings or walls: Ceiling plaster falling due to water damage.
  • Falls between levels (e.g., balconies): Lack of guardrails on a balcony.
  • Unsafe balconies or railings: Loose or broken balcony railings.
  • High radon levels: Radon gas seeping into basements from the ground.
  • Inadequate water supply: Intermittent or contaminated water supply.
  • Explosions (e.g., gas leaks): Leaking gas pipes posing a risk of explosion.
  • Fire from cooking appliances: Grease fires from unattended stoves.

Category 2 Hazards: Less immediate but still significant risks, ordered by likelihood of occurrence in an un-renovated property:

  • Worn carpets with trip hazard: Frayed or loose carpet edges causing tripping.
  • Inadequate ventilation: No extractor fans in bathrooms or kitchens causing dampness.
  • Pest infestations: Rodents or insects in the property causing health risks.
  • Falls on level surfaces: Slippery tiles or wet floors.
  • Excessive noise: Constant noise from nearby traffic or industrial activity.
  • Hot surfaces and materials (risk of burns): Unshielded radiators or hot water pipes.
  • Inadequate lighting: Dim or insufficient lighting in key areas like stairwells.
  • Entry by intruders (inadequate security): Weak locks on doors and windows.
  • Overcrowding: Too many occupants for the available space, leading to unsafe living conditions.
  • Inadequate cooking facilities: No proper kitchen setup for safe food preparation.
  • Poor ergonomics (e.g., poorly designed living spaces): Kitchen counters that are too high or low.
  • Excess heat: Poorly ventilated attic spaces becoming excessively hot.

Applying This:

When reclaiming stamp duty based on property condition, it’s essential to understand that:

  • The property must have had hazards at the time of purchase that could justify a prohibition notice.
  • The property doesn’t need to be visibly derelict; specific hazards like faulty wiring or unserviced gas appliances may be sufficient.
  • Documenting these hazards with evidence, such as inspection reports and photographs, is crucial for a successful reclaim.



Condition Assessment Tool



Reasons for Reclaim Denial  

The Finance Act 2003 outlines specific scenarios under which a reclaim for overpaid Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) may be denied. Understanding these reasons is crucial for ensuring that claims are prepared accurately and have the best chance of approval. Here are the primary reasons a reclaim might be denied, with direct quotes from the legislation:

1.Lack of Supporting Evidence

One of the most common reasons for the denial of a reclaim for overpaid Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) is the lack of sufficient supporting evidence. According to the Finance Act 2003, specifically Paragraph 34, Schedule 10, the necessity for comprehensive documentation to substantiate claims is emphasised. The legislation stipulates:

“An officer of Revenue and Customs may refuse a claim if the claimant does not— (a) make available all such records as are required by the officer, or (b) provide all such information, in such form as may be required by the officer, in support of the claim” (Finance Act 2003, Schedule 10, Paragraph 34(1)).

Furthermore,

“A claim may be refused by an officer of Revenue and Customs if the officer is not satisfied by the evidence provided in support of the claim” (Finance Act 2003, Schedule 10, Paragraph 34(2)).

To support a reclaim for overpaid SDLT, the claimant must provide comprehensive and compelling evidence that justifies the reclassification of the property and demonstrates the overpayment. The required documentation includes:

  • Photographs and Video Footage: Visual evidence of the property’s condition at the time of purchase is critical. This evidence should clearly show any structural damages, lack of utilities, or other significant issues that justify the reclassification from residential to non-residential. High-resolution images and detailed video tours can provide a clear picture of the property’s state.
  • Property Surveys: Detailed reports from qualified surveyors are helpful. These surveys should document property condition and purchase. The surveys must be dated around the time of the purchase to validate the property’s condition at that time.
  • Contractor Invoices: Documentation of any repair and maintenance work needed to make the property habitable can support the claim. These invoices should detail the specific issues addressed and the costs involved, indicating that significant repairs were necessary to render the property fit for residential use.
  • Legal Documents: Copies of legal documents, such as the TR1 (Transfer of Whole of Registered Title), SDLT5 (Certificate of Stamp Duty Land Tax), contract of sale, and completion statement, are necessary to establish the transaction details and support the claim’s timeline. These documents confirm the purchase price, date, and any relevant terms that might impact the SDLT assessment.

HMRC requires this evidence to ensure that the claim is legitimate and that the property’s condition at the time of purchase justifies a reclassification. Without sufficient and convincing documentation, HMRC is likely to deny the claim, as there would be no concrete proof to support the assertion that the SDLT was overpaid due to an incorrect property classification.

In summary, providing detailed and thorough evidence is crucial for a successful reclaim. Claimants must ensure that all required documentation is complete, accurate, and compelling to substantiate their claim and avoid denial based on insufficient supporting evidence.

2. Time Limit Expired
The Finance Act 2003 specifies a strict time frame within which claims must be made. According to Section 80, claims for SDLT reassessment must be submitted within four years from the effective date of the transaction. The legislation states:

“An assessment to tax may not be made more than 4 years after the effective date of the transaction” (Finance Act 2003, Section 80).

If the claim is made after this period, it is automatically denied regardless of its merits.

3. Discrepancies in the Claim
Claims must be accurate and consistent. Any discrepancies or inconsistencies in the information provided can lead to denial. The legislation under Paragraph 34A details this:

“Case C is where the claimant could have sought relief by taking such steps within a period that has now expired, and knew, or ought reasonably to have known, before the end of that period that such relief was available” (Finance Act 2003, Schedule 10, Paragraph 34A(4)).

4. Failure to Meet Legislative Requirements
Claims must comply with all legislative requirements set out in the Finance Act 2003. This includes adherence to specific provisions under Paragraphs 34A to 34E, Schedule 10, which detail circumstances under which HMRC is not liable to give effect to a claim:

“Case A is where the amount paid, or liable to be paid, is excessive by reason of a mistake in a claim or election” (Finance Act 2003, Schedule 10, Paragraph 34A(2)).

“Case B is where the claimant is or will be able to seek relief by taking other steps under this Part of this Act” (Finance Act 2003, Schedule 10, Paragraph 34A(3)).

5. Grounds Already Addressed in an Appeal
If the grounds for the claim have been previously put forward during an appeal process and a determination has been made, the claim cannot be reconsidered. This includes:

“Case D is where the claim is made on grounds that have been put to a court or tribunal in the course of an appeal by the claimant relating to the amount paid or liable to be paid, or have been put to Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs in the course of an appeal by the claimant relating to that amount that is treated as having been determined by a tribunal” (Finance Act 2003, Schedule 10, Paragraph 34A(5)).
6. Payment Made in Enforcement Proceedings

If the SDLT was paid as a result of enforcement proceedings brought by HMRC, or in accordance with an agreement settling such proceedings, a reclaim on those grounds may be denied. This includes:

“Case F is where the amount in question was paid or is liable to be paid in consequence of proceedings enforcing the payment of that amount brought against the claimant by Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, or in accordance with an agreement between the claimant and Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs settling such proceedings” (Finance Act 2003, Schedule 10, Paragraph 34A(7)).

7. Prevailing Practice
Under Paragraph 34A(8), if the overpayment resulted from a mistake in calculating the tax liability based on the practice generally prevailing at the time, the claim may be denied. This applies unless the amount paid was charged contrary to EU law:

“Case G is where the amount paid, or liable to be paid, is excessive by reason of a mistake in calculating the claimant’s liability to tax, and liability was calculated in accordance with the practice generally prevailing at the time” (Finance Act 2003, Schedule 10, Paragraph 34A(8)).


Steps to Reclaim Overpaid Stamp Duty

At the Stamp Duty Advice Bureau, we do our best to make reclaiming overpaid stamp duty as smooth and efficient as possible.

Step One: Ensure You Qualify

  • Did you purchase the property in the last four years?
  • Was it located in England or Northern Ireland?
  • Did you pay higher rate stamp duty on a property under £1 million?
  • Did the property have hazardous condition issues at the time of purchase?

If you answered “yes” to these questions, you may qualify for a reclaim.

Step Two: Assess Property Condition
Evaluate the property’s condition at the time of purchase. Identify any health and safety hazards that could qualify the property for non-residential classification. Key hazards include:

  • Damp or mould issues
  • Faulty electrical wiring
  • Gas problems
  • Damaged roof or structural problems

Use the Housing Health and Safety Rating System (HHSRS) to categorize these hazards, focusing on Category 1 (serious risks requiring immediate action) and Category 2 (significant risks).

Step Three: Gather Documentation
Collecting thorough documentation is essential for a successful claim. Ensure you have the following:

  • Photographs and Videos: Visual evidence of the property’s condition at the time of purchase.
  • Inspection Reports: Detailed reports from qualified surveyors or inspectors documenting the hazards.
  • Contractor Invoices: Invoices or receipts for any repairs or maintenance performed to address the hazards.
  • Legal Documents: Copies of essential legal documents such as TR1 (Transfer of Title), SDLT5 (Stamp Duty Land Tax return), the contract of sale, and the completion statement.

Step Four: Submit Claim to HMRC
Submit your claim to HMRC with all the supporting documentation. Here’s how to ensure a clear and comprehensive submission:

  • Detailed Explanation: Provide a detailed explanation of the reasons for the reclaim, highlighting the hazardous conditions identified and their potential impact on the property’s classification.
  • Organised Evidence: Ensure all evidence is well-organised and clearly labelled to facilitate easy review by HMRC.

Step Five: Follow Up
After submitting your claim, we will follow up with HMRC to monitor the progress:

  • Regular Check-ins: Maintain regular contact with HMRC to check on the status of your claim.

Key Points to Remember

  • Property Hazards: Ensure the property had hazards at the time of purchase that could justify a prohibition notice.
  • Sufficient Evidence: The property doesn’t need to be visibly derelict; specific hazards like faulty wiring or unserviced gas appliances may be sufficient for a reclaim.
  • Document Everything: Detailed and well-organised documentation is critical for a successful reclaim.

By following these steps and ensuring thorough documentation, we can help you effectively navigate the process of reclaiming overpaid stamp duty.